Observation review should precede interpolation. The issue table records deterministic failures and review flags without declaring unusual values wrong.
spring <- subset(synthetic_events, event == "spring")
attr(spring, "crs") <- "EPSG:26916"
checked <- ps_check_observations(
spring, x = "x", y = "y", value = "head", id = "well_id",
datetime = "datetime", unit = "unit", vertical_datum = "vertical_datum"
)
checked$summary## original_count retained_count removed_count issue_count error_count
## 1 18 18 0 0 0
## warning_count review_count
## 1 0 0
event <- ps_select_event(spring, "well_id", "datetime",
as.POSIXct("2025-03-15 12:00", tz = "UTC"), 3 * 3600)
event$summary## target_time window_start window_end
## 1 2025-03-15 12:00:00 UTC 2025-03-15 09:00:00 UTC 2025-03-15 15:00:00 UTC
## selected_minimum_time selected_maximum_time actual_span_seconds
## 1 2025-03-15 10:00:00 UTC 2025-03-15 14:00:00 UTC 14400
## well_count tie_count excluded_count
## 1 18 0 0
Records inside a time window are not automatically synoptic. Screen bins are descriptive unless explicit hydrogeologic rules support unit names.