<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.7.43 (Ruby 3.2.3) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-li-lsvr-bgp-spf-srv6-07" category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.34.1 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="BGP-SPF SRv6">Applying BGP-LS Segment Routing over IPv6(SRv6) Extensions to BGP-LS-SPF</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-li-lsvr-bgp-spf-srv6-07"/>
    <author initials="L." surname="Zhang" fullname="Li Zhang">
      <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No. 156 Beiqing Road</street>
          <city>Beijing</city>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>zhangli344@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="J." surname="Dong" fullname="Jie Dong">
      <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No. 156 Beiqing Road</street>
          <city>Beijing</city>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>jie.dong@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="K." surname="Patel" fullname="Keyur Patel">
      <organization>Arrcus, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>United States of America</country>
        </postal>
        <email>keyur@arrcus.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="J." surname="Li" fullname="Jiawei Li">
      <organization>China Satellite Network Innovation Research Institute Co., Ltd.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>lijw3@chinasatnet.com.cn</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="X." surname="Zhang" fullname="Xiaoqiu Zhang">
      <organization>China Mobile</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>zhangxiaoqiu@chinamobile.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2026" month="October" day="20"/>
    <area>Routing</area>
    <workgroup>LSVR</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <?line 77?>

<t>For network scenarios such as Massively Scaled Data Centers (MSDCs), BGP is extended for Link-State (LS) distribution and
the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm based calculation. BGP Link State Shortest Path First (BGP-LS-SPF) Routing leverages the mechanisms of both BGP protocol and
BGP-LS protocol extensions. Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) provides a source routing mechanism that allows a flow to
be restricted to a specific topological path, while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node(s) to the SRv6
domain. In some networks, it may be useful to enable SRv6 based source routing mechanism together with BGP-LS-SPF. This
document proposes to introduce the BGP Link-State (BGP-LS) extensions for SRv6 to the BGP-LS-SPF SAFI to enable SRv6 capabilities in BGP-LS-SPF. The usages and formats of these extensions are also provided in this document.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <?line 86?>

<section anchor="intro">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t><xref target="RFC9815"/> extends BGP for Link-State (LS) distribution and the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm based
calculation. BGP Link State Shortest Path First (BGP-LS-SPF) Routing leverages the mechanisms of both BGP protocol <xref target="RFC4271"/> and BGP-LS protocol extensions
<xref target="RFC9552"/>, with the extensions to BGP-LS attribute and new NLRI selection rules.</t>
      <t>Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within various topologies by
encoding paths as sequences of topological or functional sub-paths called "segments". SRv6 provides a mechanism that
allows a flow to be restricted to a specific topological path, while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress
node(s) to the SRv6 domain.</t>
      <t><xref target="RFC9085"/> defines extensions to the BGP-LS to carry SR information. <xref target="RFC9514"/> further defines extensions to BGP-LS to advertise SRv6 segments along with their behaviors and other attributes via BGP.</t>
      <t>In network scenarios such as Data Center networks, WAN networks or other networks where BGP-LS-SPF can be used as the
underlay routing protocol, it may be useful to enable SRv6 based source routing mechanism for traffic engineering and optimization.</t>
      <t>This document proposes to introduce the BGP Link-State (BGP-LS) extensions for SRv6 to the BGP-LS-SPF SAFI to enable SRv6 capabilities in BGP-LS-SPF. The usages and formats of these extensions are also provided in this document.</t>
      <section anchor="requirements-language">
        <name>Requirements Language</name>
        <t>The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
"<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
        <?line -18?>

</section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-node-attribute-tlvs">
      <name>SRv6 Node Attribute TLVs</name>
      <t>The following SRv6 Node Attributes TLVs described in <xref target="RFC9514"/> are applicable to BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
      <table anchor="ref-to-tab1">
        <name>Node Attribute TLVs for SRv6 with BGP-LS-SPF</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Type</th>
            <th align="left">Description</th>
            <th align="left">Reference</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1138</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 Capabilities TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9514</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">266</td>
            <td align="left">Node MSD TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 8814</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1035</td>
            <td align="left">SR Algorithm TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9085</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <t>These SRv6 Node Attributes TLVs are advertised associated with the BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.</t>
      <section anchor="srv6-capabilities-tlv">
        <name>SRv6 Capabilities TLV</name>
        <t>The SRv6 Capabilities TLV defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to announce the SRv6 capabilities of the node along with the
BGP-LS Node NLRI and indicates the SRv6 support by the node.</t>
        <t>For BGP-LS-SPF, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV for a BGP-LS-SPF node to advertise its support for the SRv6-related capabilities.
This is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI that
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI. When multiple SRv6 Capabilities TLVs
are received from a given node, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.</t>
        <t>If no SRv6 Capabilities TLV is advertised in the BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI, then it indicates that the originator of this
NLRI does not support SRv6.</t>
        <t>The format and flags of SRv6 Capabilities TLV of BGP-LS-SPF is consistent with that in BGP-LS. The format of BGP-LS-SPF
SRv6 Capability TLV is shown as follow:</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig1">
          <name>SRv6 Capability TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|             Flags             |            Reserved           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1038</t>
        <t>Length: 4</t>
        <t>Flags: 2-octet field. The following flags are defined:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
0                   1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |O|       Reserved            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>O-flag: If set, the node supports use of the O-bit in the SRH, as defined in <xref target="RFC9259"/>.</t>
        <t>Other flags are not defined and are reserved for future use. They <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>Reserved: 2-octet field that <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 when originated and ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>This TLV is used by a SRv6‑capable node or controller to determine wheter a node can participate in SRv6 TE path computation. If a node does not advertise its SRv6 Capabilities, then it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used for SRv6 TE path computation.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="Node-MSD">
        <name>SRv6 Node MSD Types</name>
        <t>The Node MSD TLV defined in <xref target="RFC8814"/> is used to advertise the limits and the Segment Routing Header (SRH) operations supported by the SRv6-capable node in BGP-LS.</t>
        <t>For BGP-LS-SPF, different SRv6-capable node may have different limits related to SRH processing, therefore, BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV for nodes to advertise the limits and operations.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 Node MSD TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Node Attribute that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI. When multiple SRv6 Node MSD TLVs are received from a given node, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.</t>
        <t>The MSD types for SRv6 that are defined in <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9352"/> for IS-IS are also used by BGP-LS-SPF. These MSD types are allocated in the "IGP MSD-Types" registry maintained by IANA and are shared by IS-IS, OSPF, and BGP-LS-SPF. They are described in the subsections below.</t>
        <t>The format of this TLV is the same as that in BGP-LS:</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig2">
          <name>SRv6 Node MSD TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |              Type             |             Length            |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |    MSD-Type   |  MSD-Value    |  MSD-Type...  |  MSD-Value... |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 266.</t>
        <t>Length: variable, represents the total length of the value field in octets.</t>
        <t>Value: consists of one or more pairs of a 1-octet MSD-Type and 1-octet MSD-Value. The detail description of MSD-Type and MSD-Value is in <xref section="3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8814"/>.</t>
        <t>Node MSD is the smallest MSD supported by the node on the set of interfaces configured for use by the advertising BGP-LS-SPF instance.  MSD values may be learned via a hardware API or may be provisioned.</t>
        <t>If there are multiple MSD-Types that have the same code point in a Node MSD TLV, then the Node MSD TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by the receiver.</t>
        <t>A SRv6‑capable node or controller <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> consider the Node MSD limits when computing SRv6 TE paths.</t>
        <section anchor="maximum-segments-left-msd-type">
          <name>Maximum Segments Left MSD Type</name>
          <t>The Maximum Segments Left MSD Type signals the maximum value of the Segments Left field in the SRH of a received packet before applying the Endpoint behavior associated with a SID.</t>
          <t>If no value is advertised, the supported value is assumed to be 0.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="maximum-end-pop-msd-type">
          <name>Maximum End Pop MSD Type</name>
          <t>The Maximum End Pop MSD Type signals the maximum number of SIDs in the SRH to which the node can apply "Penultimate Segment Pop (PSP) of the SRH" or "Ultimate Segment Pop (USP) of the SRH" behaviors, which defined in <xref section="4.16" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
          <t>If the advertised value is zero or no value is advertised, then the node cannot apply the PSP or USP flavors.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="maximum-hencaps-msd-type">
          <name>Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type</name>
          <t>The Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type signals the maximum number of SIDs that can be added as part of the H.Encaps behavior as defined in <xref target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
          <t>If the advertised value is zero or no value is advertised, then the headend can apply an SR Policy that only contains one segment without inserting any SRH.</t>
          <t>A non-zero SRH Max H.Encaps MSD indicates that the headend can insert an SRH with SIDs up to the advertised value.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="maximum-end-d-msd-type">
          <name>Maximum End D MSD Type</name>
          <t>The Maximum End D MSD Type specifies the maximum number of SIDs present in an SRH when performing decapsulation. These include, but are not limited to, End.DX6, End.DT4, End.DT46, End with USD, and End.X with USD as defined in <xref target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
          <t>If the advertised value is zero or no value is advertised, then the node cannot apply any behavior that results in decapsulation and forwarding of the inner packet when the outer IPv6 header contains an SRH.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sr-algorithm-tlv">
        <name>SR-Algorithm TLV</name>
        <t><xref target="RFC9514"/> specifies that the algorithm support for SRv6 is advertised via the SR-Algorithm TLV specified in <xref target="RFC9085"/>. The SR-Algorithm is used to advertise the SR algorithms supported by the node.</t>
        <t>This TLV is a basic TLV of SR and <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be supported in BGP-LS-SPF. The SR-Algorithm TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Node Attribute that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI. If a node receiving multiple SR-Algorithm TLVs in the BGP-LS-SPF Node Attribute, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.</t>
        <t>If a SRv6-capable node does not advertise the SR-Algorithm TLV, it implies that algorithm 0 is the only algorithm supported by the node.</t>
        <t>If the originating node does advertise the SR-Algorithm sub-TLV, then algorithm 0 <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present while non-zero algorithms <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be present.</t>
        <t>The format of Algorithm fields in this TLV is consistent with that in BGP-LS, as defined in <xref section="2.1.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9085"/>.</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig3">
          <name>SRv6 Algorithm TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |   Type        |     Length    |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Algorithm 1   |  Algorithm 2  | Algorithm ... |  Algorithm n  |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1035</t>
        <t>Length: Variable</t>
        <t>Algorithm: 1 octet of algorithm.</t>
        <t>The algorithm values are allocated in the "IGP Algorithm Type" registry defined in <xref target="RFC8665"/>, these values are shared by IS-IS, OSPF, and BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be omitted or advertised with only algorithm 0 when only the basic SPF algorithm is supported. Support for Flex-Algo is out of scope of this document.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sid-reachability">
      <name>SRv6 SIDs and Reachability</name>
      <t>An SRv6 SID is 128 bits and consists of locator, function, and argument parts as described in <xref target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
      <t>An BGP-LS-SPF router is provisioned with algorithm-specific locators for each algorithm supported by that router. Each locator is a covering prefix for all SIDs provisioned on that router that have the matching algorithm.</t>
      <t>Locators <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised as BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI objects along with the SRv6 Locator TLVs (see <xref target="locator"/>) in its BGP-LS-SPF Attribute. Forwarding entries for the locators advertised in the BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be installed in the forwarding plane of receiving SRv6-capable routers when the associated algorithm is supported by the receiving BGP-LS-SPF router. The processing of the prefix of the Locator, the calculation of its reachability, and the installation in the forwarding plane follows the process of BGP-LS-SPF <xref target="RFC9815"/>.</t>
      <t>SRv6 SIDs are advertised as SRv6 SID Information TLVs (see <xref target="SID-info"/>) in the SRv6 SID NLRI, except for SRv6 SIDs that are associated with a specific neighbor/link and are therefore advertised as SRv6 End.X SID TLV (see <xref target="end.x-sid"/>).</t>
      <t>SRv6 SIDs received from other nodes are not directly routable and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be installed in the forwarding plane. Reachability to SRv6 SIDs depends upon the existence of a covering locator.</t>
      <t>Adherence to the rules defined in this section will ensure that SRv6 SIDs associated with a supported algorithm will be forwarded correctly, while SRv6 SIDs associated with an unsupported algorithm will be dropped.</t>
      <t>NOTE: The drop behavior depends on the absence of a default/summary route covering a given locator.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-link-attribute-tlvs">
      <name>SRv6 Link Attribute TLVs</name>
      <t>The following Link Attributes described in <xref target="RFC9514"/> and <xref target="RFC9085"/> are applicable to BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
      <table anchor="ref-to-tab2">
        <name>Link Attribute TLVs for SRv6 with BGP-LS-SPF</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Type</th>
            <th align="left">Description</th>
            <th align="left">Reference</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1106</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 End.X SID TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9514</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1106</td>
            <td align="left">L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9085</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">267</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 Link MSD TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 8814</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <t>These SRv6 Link Attribute TLVs are advertised associated with the BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI.</t>
      <section anchor="end.x-sid">
        <name>SRv6 End.X SID TLV</name>
        <t>The SRv6 End.X SID TLV defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to advertise the SRv6 SIDs associated with an IGP Adjacency SID behavior that correspond to a point-to-point or point-to-multipoint link or adjacency of the node running the IS-IS or OSPFv3 protocols. It is also used by BGP-LS to advertise the BGP EPE Peer Adjacency SID for SRv6 on the same lines as specified for SR-MPLS in <xref target="RFC9086"/>.</t>
        <t>BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV to advertise the SRv6 SIDs correspond to a point-to-point or adjacency of the node running the BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 End.X SID TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Link Attribute that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>More than one instance of this TLV (one for each SRv6 End.X SID) can be included in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute. Multiple SRv6 End.X SID TLVs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be associated with the same adjacency.</t>
        <t>Every SRv6-enabled node <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> instantiate at least one unique SRv6 End.X SID corresponding to each of its neighbors, although it <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> omit doing so if features like TE or TI-LFA that require End.X SID are not in use.</t>
        <t>All End.X SIDs <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be a subnet of a locator with matching algorithm that is advertised by the same BGP-LS-SPF node in an SRv6 Locator TLV. End.X SIDs that do not meet this requirement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored. This ensures that the BGP-LS-SPF node advertising the End.X is also advertising its corresponding locator with the algorithm that will be used for computing paths destined to the SID.</t>
        <t>The format of this TLV is the same as in BGP-LS:</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig4">
          <name>SRv6 End.X SID TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|        Endpoint Behavior      |      Flags    |   Algorithm   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|     Weight    |   Reserved    |  SID (16 octets) ...          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)             | Sub-TLVs (variable) . . .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1106</t>
        <t>Length: variable</t>
        <t>Endpoint Behavior: 2-octet field. The Endpoint behavior code point for this SRv6 SID as defined in Section 10.2 of <xref target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
        <t>Flags: 1 octet. The definition of flags are same as that in IS-IS SRv6 End.X SID sub-TLV (<xref section="8.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9352"/>) and the OSPFv3 SRv6 End.X SID sub-TLV (<xref section="9.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9513"/>).</t>
        <t>Algorithm: 1-octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID. The algorithm associated with the SRv6 Locator from which the SID is allocated.</t>
        <t>Weight: 1-octet field. The value represents the weight of the SID for the purpose of load balancing. The use of the weight is defined in <xref target="RFC8402"/>.</t>
        <t>Reserved: 1-octet field that <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 when originated and ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>SID: 16-octet field. This field encodes the advertised SRv6 SID as a 128-bit value.</t>
        <t>Sub-TLVs: Used to advertise sub-TLVs that provide additional attributes for the specific SRv6 SID.</t>
        <t>The End.X SID advertised by this TLV is used for SRv6 TE path computation by a SRv6‑capable node or controller.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="l2-bundle-member-attributes-tlv">
        <name>L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV</name>
        <t>The L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV is defined in <xref target="RFC9085"/>, it identifies an L2 Bundle Member link, which in turn is
associated with a parent L3 link. This TLV is useful when entities external to BGP-LS-SPF wish to control traffic flows
on the individual physical links that comprise the Layer 2 interface bundle.</t>
        <t>The network deployed BGP-LS-SPF may include trunk links. Therefore, BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> support this TLV to advertise L2 bundle
member link attributes.</t>
        <t>The L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Link Attribute with BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> include sub-TLVs that describe attributes associated with the bundle member. The identified bundle member
represents a unidirectional path from the originating node to the neighbor specified in the parent L3 link.</t>
        <t>Multiple L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLVs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be associated with a BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI.</t>
        <t>Advertisement of this TLV implies that the identified link is a member of the L2 Bundle associated with the Parent L3
Link, and the member link is operationally up. Therefore, advertisements <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be withdrawn if the link becomes operationally
down or it is no longer a member of the identified L2 Bundle.</t>
        <t>The format of this TLV is the same as that in BGP-LS:</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig5">
          <name>L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                     L2 Bundle Member Descriptor               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  Link Attribute Sub-TLVs(variable)          //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>Where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1172</t>
        <t>Length: Variable.</t>
        <t>L2 Bundle Member Descriptor: 4-octet field that carries a link-local identifier as defined in <xref target="RFC4202"/>.</t>
        <t>Link attribute Sub-TLVs: variable, the detail description of these Sub-TLVs is specified in <xref section="2.2.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9085"/>.</t>
        <t>In Trunk or LAG scenarios, SRv6‑capable nodes or controllers may consider the attributes of these Layer‑2 links in SRv6 TE path computation.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="srv6-link-msd-types">
        <name>SRv6 Link MSD Types</name>
        <t>The Link MSD TLV defined in <xref target="RFC8814"/> is used to advertise the limits and the SRH operations supported on the specific link by the SRv6-capable node. BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV to advertise the limits and operations supported on the specific link to enable segment routing. The SRv6 MSD types specified in <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9352"/> are also used with the BGP-LS-SPF Link MSD TLV, as these code points are shared between the IS-IS, OSPF, and BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 Node MSD TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Link Attributes that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI. When multiple SRv6 Link MSD TLVs are received from a given node, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI.</t>
        <t>The format and different MSD Types of SRv6 Link MSD TLV is the same as <xref target="Node-MSD"/>, the Type of Link MSD TLV is 267<xref target="RFC8814"/>.</t>
        <t>A SRv6‑capable node or controller <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> consider the link MSD limits when computing SRv6 TE paths.</t>
        <t>In addition to link MSD, the link MTU also should be considered during SRv6 TE path calculation and forwarding to avoid oversized packets.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-prefix-attribute-tlvs">
      <name>SRv6 Prefix Attribute TLVs</name>
      <t>The following BGP-LS SRv6 Prefix Attributes introduced in <xref target="RFC9514"/> are applicable to BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
      <table anchor="ref-to-tab3">
        <name>Prefix Attribute TLVs for SRv6 with BGP-LS-SPF</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Type</th>
            <th align="left">Description</th>
            <th align="left">Reference</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1162</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 Locator TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9514</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <t>These SRv6 Prefix Attribute TLVs are advertised associated with the BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI.</t>
      <section anchor="locator">
        <name>SRv6 Locator TLV</name>
        <t>The SRv6 Locator TLV defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to advertise the locators supported by each node.  Locator is the key component of SRv6 SID, BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV to enable segment routing.</t>
        <t>A node is provisioned with one or more locators supported by that node. Locators are covering prefixes for the set of SIDs provisioned on that node. If more than one locator is provisioned for a node, then each locator is advertised as an individual BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI object along with the SRv6 Locator TLV in its BGP-LS-SPF Attribute.</t>
        <t>Only one SRv6 Locator TLVs <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be advertised in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute, associating with the BGP-LS-SPF prefix NLRI.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised only once in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute associated with the BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI.</t>
        <t>When multiple SRv6 Locator TLVs are received from a given node in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV.</t>
        <t>The format of the SRv6 Locator TLV is the same as BGP-LS<xref section="5.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9514"/>.</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig6">
          <name>SRv6 Locator TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|      Flags    |   Algorithm   |           Reserved            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                            Metric                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Sub-TLVs (variable) . . .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1162</t>
        <t>Length: variable</t>
        <t>Flags: 1 octet of flags. Currently, the flags field is not used and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to zero on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>Algorithm: 1-octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID, as defined in the "IGP Algorithm Types" registry <xref target="RFC8665"/>.</t>
        <t>Reserved: 2-octet field. The value <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 when originated and ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>Metric: 4-octet field. The value of the metric for the locator.</t>
        <t>Sub-TLVs: Used to advertise sub-TLVs that provide additional attributes for the given SRv6 Locator.  Currently, none are defined.</t>
        <t>Since <xref target="RFC9815"/> specifies that the Prefix Metric (TLV 1155) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised associated with the prefix NLRI to be considered for route calculation, therefore the Metric field in this TLV is no longer usable. The Metric field in this TLV <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be set to 0 and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>As specificed in <xref target="sid-reachability"/>, this TLV is used by SRv6‑capable nodes to determine the reachability of SRv6 SIDs before installing them in the forwarding plane.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-sid-nlri">
      <name>SRv6 SID NLRI</name>
      <t>The SRv6 SID NLRI defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to carry the SRv6 SID information. When SRv6 SIDs need to be advertised in BGP-SPF, the following NLRI type and attributes TLV for SRv6 SID are applicable to BGP-LS-SPF SAFI:</t>
      <table anchor="ref-to-tab4">
        <name>SRv6 SID NLRI with BGP-LS-SPF</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Type</th>
            <th align="left">NLRI Type</th>
            <th align="left">Reference</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">6</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 SID NLRI</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9514</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">518</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 SID Information TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9514</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <t>The format of SRv6 SID NLRI is the same as that in BGP-LS<xref section="6" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9514"/>.</t>
      <t>An SRv6-enabled node <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> advertise at least one SRv6 SID associated with an End behavior encapsulated in the SRv6 NLRI for itself as specified in <xref target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
      <t>An SRv6-enabled node <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> advertise multiple instances of the SRv6 SID NLRI -- one for each of the SRv6 SIDs to be advertised.</t>
      <section anchor="SID-info">
        <name>SRv6 SID Information TLV</name>
        <t>The SRv6 SID Information TLV is used to carry the SRv6 SID that do not require a particular neighbor in a SRv6 SID NLRI. This TLV <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be supported in BGP-LS-SPF to advertise SRv6 SIDs of each node.</t>
        <t>SRv6 SID Information TLV is a mandatory TLV in SRv6 NLRI. For each SRv6 SID NLRI, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> contain a single SRv6 SID Information TLV.</t>
        <t>When multiple SRv6 SID Information TLVs are received from a given node in an BGP-LS-SPF SRv6 SID NLRI for the same SID, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV in the NLRI.</t>
        <t>The format of SRv6 SID Information TLV is the same as <xref section="6.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9514"/>.</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig7">
          <name>SRv6 SID Information TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (16 octets) ...                                        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 518</t>
        <t>Length: 16</t>
        <t>SID: 16-octet field. This field encodes the advertised SRv6 SID as a 128-bit value.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 SID <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be allocated from its associated locator. SRv6 SIDs that are NOT allocated from the associated locator <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored.</t>
        <t>The SID information carried in this TLV is used by a SRv6‑capable node, controller or PCE to compute SRv6 TE paths.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-sid-attribute-tlvs">
      <name>SRv6 SID Attribute TLVs</name>
      <section anchor="srv6-endpoint-behavior-tlv">
        <name>SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV</name>
        <t>The Endpoint Behavior TLV defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to advertise the behaviors associated with a SID. The BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV to enable the advertisement of behaviors associated with a SRv6 SID.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV is a mandatory TLV that <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be included once in the BGP-LS Attribute associated with the BGP-LS-SPF SRv6 SID NLRI.</t>
        <t>When multiple SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLVs are received from a given node in the BGP-LS Attribute, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV.</t>
        <t>The format of SRv6 Endpoint is the same as that in BGP-LS.</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig8">
          <name>SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|        Endpoint Behavior      |      Flags    |   Algorithm   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>Where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1250</t>
        <t>Length: 4</t>
        <t>Endpoint Behavior: 2-octet field. The Endpoint behavior code point for this SRv6 SID.</t>
        <t>Flags: 1 octet of flags. No flags are currently defined, and this field <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>Algorithm: 1-octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID.</t>
        <t>Supported behavior values for this TLV are defined in <xref target="endpoint-behaviors"/> of this document. Unsupported or unrecognized behavior values are ignored by the receiver.</t>
        <t>The endpoint behavior carried in this TLV is used together with the SRv6 SID information TLV for SRv6 TE path computation by a SRv6‑capable node or controller.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="srv6-sid-structure-tlv">
        <name>SRv6 SID Structure TLV</name>
        <t>The SRv6 SID Structure TLV defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to advertise the length of each individual part of the SRv6 SID as defined in <xref target="RFC8986"/>. BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> support this TLV to indicate the length of each individual part of the SRv6 SID of BGP-LS-SPF, which is useful in some scenarios using compressed SID.</t>
        <t>It is an optional TLV that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute for SRv6 SID NLRI and as a sub-TLV of the SRv6 End.X SID TLV.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 SID Structure TLV <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> appear more than once in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute. If it appears more than once in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute, then its parent SID TLV or NLRI <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by the receiver.</t>
        <t>The format of SRv6 Structure TLV is the same as that in BGP-LS.</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig9">
          <name>SRv6 SID Structure TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    LB Length  |  LN Length    | Fun. Length   |  Arg. Length  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1252</t>
        <t>Length: 4</t>
        <t>LB Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Locator Block length in bits.</t>
        <t>LN Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Locator Node length in bits.</t>
        <t>Fun. Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Function length in bits.</t>
        <t>Arg. Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Argument length in bits.</t>
        <t>The sum of all four sizes advertised in SRv6 SID Structure TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be less than or equal to 128 bits. If the sum of all four sizes advertised in the SRv6 SID Structure sub-TLV is larger than 128 bits, the parent TLV or NLRI <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by the receiver.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 SID Structure sub-TLV is intended for informational use by the control and management planes, not for SRv6 TE path computation. The typical use cases for this information are described in the <xref section="10" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9513"/> and <xref section="9" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9352"/>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="endpoint-behaviors">
      <name>Advertising Endpoint Behaviors</name>
      <t>Endpoint behaviors are defined in <xref target="RFC8986"/>. The code points for the Endpoint behaviors are defined in the "SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors" registry of <xref target="RFC8986"/>. This section lists the Endpoint behaviors and their code points, which <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be advertised by BGP-LS-SPF and the TLVs in which each type <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> appear.</t>
      <table anchor="ref-to-tab5">
        <name>SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors in BGP-LS-SPF</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Endpoint Behavior</th>
            <th align="left">Endpoint Behavior Code Point</th>
            <th align="left">End SID</th>
            <th align="left">End.X SID</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">End(PSP, USP, USD)</td>
            <td align="left">1-4, 28-31</td>
            <td align="left">Y</td>
            <td align="left">N</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">End.X(PSP, USP, USD)</td>
            <td align="left">5-8, 32-35</td>
            <td align="left">N</td>
            <td align="left">Y</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>This document introduces no additional security vulnerabilities in addition to the ones as described in <xref target="RFC9552"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>This document has no IANA actions.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="acknowledgements">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>This document refers extensively to the content of <xref target="RFC9514"/>, <xref target="RFC9513"/>, <xref target="RFC9352"/>, and <xref target="RFC9085"/>. The authors would like to thank the authors of these RFCs, they are James Uttaro, Hani Elmalky, Arjun Sreekantiah, Les Ginsberg, Shunwan Zhuang, Zhenbin Li, Zhibo Hu, Ketan Talaulikar, Peter Psenak, Clarence Filsfils, Ahmed Bashandy, Bruno Decraene, Stefano Previdi, Hannes Gredler, and Mach(Guoyi) Chen.</t>
      <t>The authors also would like to thank Acee Lindem for his valuable comments and suggestions.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references anchor="sec-combined-references">
      <name>References</name>
      <references anchor="sec-normative-references">
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC9815" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9815" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9815.xml">
          <front>
            <title>BGP Link State (BGP-LS) Shortest Path First (SPF) Routing</title>
            <author fullname="K. Patel" initials="K." surname="Patel"/>
            <author fullname="A. Lindem" initials="A." surname="Lindem"/>
            <author fullname="S. Zandi" initials="S." surname="Zandi"/>
            <author fullname="W. Henderickx" initials="W." surname="Henderickx"/>
            <date month="July" year="2025"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Many Massively Scaled Data Centers (MSDCs) have converged on simplified Layer 3 (L3) routing. Furthermore, requirements for operational simplicity have led many of these MSDCs to converge on BGP as their single routing protocol for both fabric routing and Data Center Interconnect (DCI) routing. This document describes extensions to BGP for use with BGP Link State (BGP-LS) distribution and the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm. In doing this, it allows BGP to be efficiently used as both the underlay protocol and the overlay protocol in MSDCs.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9815"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9815"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4271" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4271.xml">
          <front>
            <title>A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)</title>
            <author fullname="Y. Rekhter" initials="Y." role="editor" surname="Rekhter"/>
            <author fullname="T. Li" initials="T." role="editor" surname="Li"/>
            <author fullname="S. Hares" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Hares"/>
            <date month="January" year="2006"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document discusses the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), which is an inter-Autonomous System routing protocol.</t>
              <t>The primary function of a BGP speaking system is to exchange network reachability information with other BGP systems. This network reachability information includes information on the list of Autonomous Systems (ASes) that reachability information traverses. This information is sufficient for constructing a graph of AS connectivity for this reachability from which routing loops may be pruned, and, at the AS level, some policy decisions may be enforced.</t>
              <t>BGP-4 provides a set of mechanisms for supporting Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR). These mechanisms include support for advertising a set of destinations as an IP prefix, and eliminating the concept of network "class" within BGP. BGP-4 also introduces mechanisms that allow aggregation of routes, including aggregation of AS paths.</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 1771. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4271"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4271"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9552" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9552" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9552.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Distribution of Link-State and Traffic Engineering Information Using BGP</title>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <date month="December" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many environments, a component external to a network is called upon to perform computations based on the network topology and the current state of the connections within the network, including Traffic Engineering (TE) information. This is information typically distributed by IGP routing protocols within the network.</t>
              <t>This document describes a mechanism by which link-state and TE information can be collected from networks and shared with external components using the BGP routing protocol. This is achieved using a BGP Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI) encoding format. The mechanism applies to physical and virtual (e.g., tunnel) IGP links. The mechanism described is subject to policy control.</t>
              <t>Applications of this technique include Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) servers and Path Computation Elements (PCEs).</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 7752 by completely replacing that document. It makes some small changes and clarifications to the previous specification. This document also obsoletes RFC 9029 by incorporating the updates that it made to RFC 7752.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9552"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9552"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9085" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9085" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9085.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing</title>
            <author fullname="S. Previdi" initials="S." surname="Previdi"/>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="H. Gredler" initials="H." surname="Gredler"/>
            <author fullname="M. Chen" initials="M." surname="Chen"/>
            <date month="August" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths by encoding paths as sequences of topological subpaths, called "segments". These segments are advertised by routing protocols, e.g., by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3) within IGP topologies.</t>
              <t>This document defines extensions to the Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) address family in order to carry SR information via BGP.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9085"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9085"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9514" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9514" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9514.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)</title>
            <author fullname="G. Dawra" initials="G." surname="Dawra"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <author fullname="M. Chen" initials="M." surname="Chen"/>
            <author fullname="D. Bernier" initials="D." surname="Bernier"/>
            <author fullname="B. Decraene" initials="B." surname="Decraene"/>
            <date month="December" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within various topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological or functional sub-paths called "segments". These segments are advertised by various protocols such as BGP, IS-IS, and OSPFv3.</t>
              <t>This document defines extensions to BGP - Link State (BGP-LS) to advertise SRv6 segments along with their behaviors and other attributes via BGP. The BGP-LS address-family solution for SRv6 described in this document is similar to BGP-LS for SR for the MPLS data plane, which is defined in RFC 9085.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9514"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9514"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8814" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8814" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8814.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using the Border Gateway Protocol - Link State</title>
            <author fullname="J. Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura"/>
            <author fullname="U. Chunduri" initials="U." surname="Chunduri"/>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <author fullname="G. Mirsky" initials="G." surname="Mirsky"/>
            <author fullname="N. Triantafillis" initials="N." surname="Triantafillis"/>
            <date month="August" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines a way for a Border Gateway Protocol - Link
State (BGP-LS) speaker to advertise multiple types of supported
Maximum SID Depths (MSDs) at node and/or link granularity.</t>
              <t>Such advertisements allow entities (e.g., centralized controllers) to
determine whether a particular Segment Identifier (SID) stack can be
supported in a given network.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8814"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8814"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9352" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9352" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9352.xml">
          <front>
            <title>IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing over the IPv6 Data Plane</title>
            <author fullname="P. Psenak" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Psenak"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="A. Bashandy" initials="A." surname="Bashandy"/>
            <author fullname="B. Decraene" initials="B." surname="Decraene"/>
            <author fullname="Z. Hu" initials="Z." surname="Hu"/>
            <date month="February" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Segment Routing (SR) architecture allows a flexible definition of the end-to-end path by encoding it as a sequence of topological elements called "segments". It can be implemented over the MPLS or the IPv6 data plane. This document describes the IS-IS extensions required to support SR over the IPv6 data plane.</t>
              <t>This document updates RFC 7370 by modifying an existing registry.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9352"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9352"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9513" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9513" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9513.xml">
          <front>
            <title>OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)</title>
            <author fullname="Z. Li" initials="Z." surname="Li"/>
            <author fullname="Z. Hu" initials="Z." surname="Hu"/>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <author fullname="P. Psenak" initials="P." surname="Psenak"/>
            <date month="December" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Segment Routing (SR) architecture allows a flexible definition of the end-to-end path by encoding it as a sequence of topological elements called segments. It can be implemented over an MPLS or IPv6 data plane. This document describes the OSPFv3 extensions required to support SR over the IPv6 data plane.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9513"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9513"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references anchor="sec-informative-references">
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC9259" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9259" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9259.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)</title>
            <author fullname="Z. Ali" initials="Z." surname="Ali"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="S. Matsushima" initials="S." surname="Matsushima"/>
            <author fullname="D. Voyer" initials="D." surname="Voyer"/>
            <author fullname="M. Chen" initials="M." surname="Chen"/>
            <date month="June" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes how the existing IPv6 mechanisms for ping and traceroute can be used in a Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) network. The document also specifies the OAM flag (O-flag) in the Segment Routing Header (SRH) for performing controllable and predictable flow sampling from segment endpoints. In addition, the document describes how a centralized monitoring system performs a path continuity check between any nodes within an SRv6 domain.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9259"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9259"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8986" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8986" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8986.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Network Programming</title>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." role="editor" surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="P. Camarillo" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Camarillo"/>
            <author fullname="J. Leddy" initials="J." surname="Leddy"/>
            <author fullname="D. Voyer" initials="D." surname="Voyer"/>
            <author fullname="S. Matsushima" initials="S." surname="Matsushima"/>
            <author fullname="Z. Li" initials="Z." surname="Li"/>
            <date month="February" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Network Programming framework enables a network operator or an application to specify a packet processing program by encoding a sequence of instructions in the IPv6 packet header.</t>
              <t>Each instruction is implemented on one or several nodes in the network and identified by an SRv6 Segment Identifier in the packet.</t>
              <t>This document defines the SRv6 Network Programming concept and specifies the base set of SRv6 behaviors that enables the creation of interoperable overlays with underlay optimization.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8986"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8986"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8665" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8665" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8665.xml">
          <front>
            <title>OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing</title>
            <author fullname="P. Psenak" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Psenak"/>
            <author fullname="S. Previdi" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Previdi"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="H. Gredler" initials="H." surname="Gredler"/>
            <author fullname="R. Shakir" initials="R." surname="Shakir"/>
            <author fullname="W. Henderickx" initials="W." surname="Henderickx"/>
            <author fullname="J. Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura"/>
            <date month="December" year="2019"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing (SR) allows a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological subpaths called "segments". These segments are advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF).</t>
              <t>This document describes the OSPFv2 extensions required for Segment Routing.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8665"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8665"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9086" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9086" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9086.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress Peer Engineering</title>
            <author fullname="S. Previdi" initials="S." surname="Previdi"/>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="K. Patel" initials="K." surname="Patel"/>
            <author fullname="S. Ray" initials="S." surname="Ray"/>
            <author fullname="J. Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong"/>
            <date month="August" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>A node steers a packet through a controlled set of instructions, called segments, by prepending the packet with a list of segment identifiers (SIDs). A segment can represent any instruction, topological or service based. SR segments allow steering a flow through any topological path and service chain while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node of the SR domain.</t>
              <t>This document describes an extension to Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) for advertisement of BGP Peering Segments along with their BGP peering node information so that efficient BGP Egress Peer Engineering (EPE) policies and strategies can be computed based on Segment Routing.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9086"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9086"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8402" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8402" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8402.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Segment Routing Architecture</title>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." role="editor" surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="S. Previdi" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Previdi"/>
            <author fullname="L. Ginsberg" initials="L." surname="Ginsberg"/>
            <author fullname="B. Decraene" initials="B." surname="Decraene"/>
            <author fullname="S. Litkowski" initials="S." surname="Litkowski"/>
            <author fullname="R. Shakir" initials="R." surname="Shakir"/>
            <date month="July" year="2018"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source routing paradigm. A node steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions, called "segments". A segment can represent any instruction, topological or service based. A segment can have a semantic local to an SR node or global within an SR domain. SR provides a mechanism that allows a flow to be restricted to a specific topological path, while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node(s) to the SR domain.</t>
              <t>SR can be directly applied to the MPLS architecture with no change to the forwarding plane. A segment is encoded as an MPLS label. An ordered list of segments is encoded as a stack of labels. The segment to process is on the top of the stack. Upon completion of a segment, the related label is popped from the stack.</t>
              <t>SR can be applied to the IPv6 architecture, with a new type of routing header. A segment is encoded as an IPv6 address. An ordered list of segments is encoded as an ordered list of IPv6 addresses in the routing header. The active segment is indicated by the Destination Address (DA) of the packet. The next active segment is indicated by a pointer in the new routing header.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8402"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8402"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4202" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4202" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4202.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)</title>
            <author fullname="K. Kompella" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Kompella"/>
            <author fullname="Y. Rekhter" initials="Y." role="editor" surname="Rekhter"/>
            <date month="October" year="2005"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies routing extensions in support of carrying link state information for Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS). This document enhances the routing extensions required to support MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE). [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4202"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4202"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <?line 677?>


    <section anchor="contributors" numbered="false" toc="include" removeInRFC="false">
      <name>Contributors</name>
      <contact initials="Y." surname="Wang" fullname="Yifan Wang">
        <organization>Huawei</organization>
        <address>
          <postal>
            <country>China</country>
          </postal>
          <email>wangyifan82@huawei.com</email>
        </address>
      </contact>
      <contact fullname="Fan Yang">
        <organization>China Satellite Network Innovation Research Institute Co., Ltd.</organization>
        <address>
          <postal>
            <country>China</country>
          </postal>
          <email>yangf4@chinasatnet.com.cn</email>
        </address>
      </contact>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>
